Nov. 6th, 2004

pmb: (Default)
Data from here and here and eyeballing voting technologies used from here.

The error rate is attained by subtracting each candidates exit poll numbers from their actual percentage of votes tabulated.

StateKerry ErrorBush ErrorMethods
Alaska-12.0+8.9Optical
North Carolina-4.5+4.1DRE and mixed
Florida-3.9+3.1Optical and DRE
Minnesota-2.9+3.6Mixed, optical, and DRE
Ohio-2.5+2.0Punch card, some DRE
Pennsylvania-2.2+2.6Some of everything - lever, optical, DRE
Wisconsin-2.2+2.4Optical, some mixed
Colorado-1.7+1.5Optical, some paper
New Mexico-1.1+1.0DRE mostly
Louisiana-0.8+0.8Lever and some DRE
Arizona-0.5-0.1Optical
Missouri+0.1-0.6Mixed, punch card, and paper
Iowa+0.2+1.1Optical, some DRE
Michigan+0.2+0.8Mixed, some DRE

Systemic errors in Kerry's favor in the polling data? Or systemic errors for Bush in the vote count? Something is messed up here. Also, I found out that the historic tendency has been for Republicans to vote early, while Democrats vote late. So the idea that this data is biased towards Dems because Repubs haven't voted yet would also go against historical trends. I would like to find more confirmation of that idea, however.


The source for that graph that freaked me out earlier.
Another nerd doing the same kind of stuff. His superior use of gnuplot and actual statistical techniques (confidence intervals and the like) is nice. He concludes that there is enough evidence to justify a thorough investigation, but not enough to accuse.

Profile

pmb: (Default)
pmb

October 2009

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2025 09:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios